Expresso

Hard. I mean, I LOVE Ana beatriz and when she gives it her best, man she's out of this world. like this: But Jessica Alba certainly has it as well. In my opinion, she looked her best in Dark Angel: But this pic from GQ comes close to it: Still, my vote goes to Ana on both counts.

I can't vote for these things without taking their personalities in consideration (or well, their 'public' personalities, that is). Bar is pretty without a doubt, but she annoys me in every vid I've seen of her. She's like the brainless, blonde highschool girl and whenever she opens her mouth, her looks decrease (to me). I don't really like Gisele's face, but her body is rocking! I think she's okay in her interviews as well, so my vote goes to her.

Ofcourse everyone is going to say Ashley. She is prettier. But I don't like her slutty personality at all, so I'm going to vote for Nikki Reed, who doesn't get enough lovin'

I agree. There is nothing left to be said about this surgery. Everyone, choose whatever you want to think about this, but stop discussing it all the time and posting the same 'evidence' over and over again will only clutter this thread.

I honestly think that if they would give her the same make-up look she had here: and here: and here: She would look almost as great as she did back then. To me, aside from aging, the most changes that I think made her look less good then she should is make-up and hair. Not to mention the lack of tan. She's been vampiric white before: And back then, it didn't look good either. So if she would get her tan back, and get hair like this: I think she would look about as good as before. Sure, everyone ages. Adri is no different. But I think that with the right hair and make-up, she could look as smashing as she did before. If you notice in the first 3 pictures she has almost the same make-up look in them. This is what suits her best. They should stick with the tried and true. For example, compare either of those great pics with this one Lost Soul posted: See the difference in make-up and tan?

^^Last time I checked she didn't have facebook. So this one is probably BS

I fell in 'love

She is gorgeous, but she really shouldn't lose more weight. She's getting that 'I'll stab you to death with my elbows, knees and collar bones' look that Paris Hilton got down to an artform. She was perfect the way she was, and now she's getting a bit too thin. This was better: (credit to VampireHorde) But who knows, the pressure and all the paps swarming around her could be getting to her.

^^Thanks! She looks great in them!

I actually don't find her pretty at all. Certainly not someone that would catch my eye when I cross the street. That said, she has made really good choices in her career and I see her go far. Guess she proves you don't have to be hot and slut it up like Ashley Greene to make it in the business

Sounds good Joe That way, those endless ethnicity discussions won't clog up model threads.

Did I miss something? When did she act like a diva? She sounds like a fun and collected person in her interviews.

Thanks for the interview!

^^Sorry I don't keep up with all the turbotalk (LMAO I know, but IMHO? ) Anyway, I just noticed that the thread is becoming more about semantics than about her ever since she hooked up with Ronaldo. Stupid debates about whether she looks her age or not and I was hoping to cut off one about whether she's a classic beauty or not. It's the kind of stuff people will keep arguing over, (like the question whether Adriana Lima has had her boobs done or not.) Sure opinions are opinions, but when they start cluttering threads it's better to move on to something else. This thread hasn't gotten that cluttered yet, so I'm hoping it'll stay that way. I guess that's what user Emily Losca was talking about when she said this thread started to resemble Bar Rafaeli's thread.

Who are you to decide what is classic beauty and what is not? As for your examples, there's hardly any consistency to be found in them. If classic beauty was a definable thing, then surely there would be a brand of women who would all meet that standard. Instead we have beauties in all shapes and sizes. Soft featured ones like Didonato, wild ones like Crawford (and dare I say it: Irina) etc. Classic beauty and what it means is different for all of us. So please let's not start another meaningless debate about what category Irina is supposed to fit in.

She doesn't look old at all. I think she looks her age. But she has curious features that make her stand out. If you need a babyface in order to be considered to look young, I'd rather look "old" like Irina. But really, what's up with the semantics?

What do you mean? Did I say something wrong?

Red is really her colour. She should keep her hair that way more often. Thanks for the pictures everyone!

I´ve heard/read somewhere that Megan didn't have a great childhood, nor a close bond with her parents. I will try to look up where I got the info from, but that might take a while. It would explain why they're so distant. For example, my friend went to live on her own when she was 16. She didn't like her parents and when I was there I never really sensed affection of any kind from both sides. Anyway, she's 22 now and has a life of her own. She and her parents speak sometimes, but she doesn't go out of her way to include them in her life. Maybe Megan feels the same. Also, since she's hounded by the paps 24/7 I get why she would want to do it fast. I mean, once the rumours got started, it had already happened. There was no time to assemble a team of parasites to go out and snap pictures of them. Sadly not everyone has a loving relationship with their family.

She looks fab! You know what's funny: I have the exact same haircolour as Iri has now. That's obviously where the comparison ends, but oh well. Did anyone else notice Jessica has stretch marks? Turns to show that even perfect looking supermodels have flaws. I feel so much better now :evil:

^^I noticed . At first I was kinda looking forward to it, but now Rotten Tomatoes and bdkreviews have given it pretty much the worst rating possible, I'm thinking I'm going to rent this one when it comes out on dvd. She seems to have only 15 minutes of screentime and her character's connection with the main character seems to have gotten lost somewhere in the montage studio. You know, I don't get it. I mean, people put effort in projects like this and it ends up like a loveless assembly of scattered scenes (from what I've read). Megan reportedly got her waist down to 18 inches (!) and had to do complex action scenes. Seems kinda pointless if you're only on screen for 15 minutes.

agree. She was one of the first to start doing it and it was years later when Madonna and other celebrities followed suit. I also think that all these visits to other countries aren't just for her to boost her image. She doesn't need it. She always had a good image. Sure, people thought she was weird back in the BB thornton days, but other than her lips and the whole deal over her and Brad Pitt getting together, she hasn't gotten bad press. And I guess it goes like that "just this kid." and then after a while, "ah, we've managed with [insert number] of kids, what harm is one extra going to do?" She has the money so it's not like the new kid is going to make it harder to get around--which stops a lot of couples from getting more kids. But I guess that's coming from a girl who loves kids. I organise all these kids activities during the summer. Sure, I get paid for it, but I love the work. Kids tend to like me for some reason and in turn it's very easy for me to get along with them (probably because I can be insanely immature ). Maybe Angie has the same. Anyway, thanks for the pictures all! Though I find Megan Fox (before she inflated her lips) to be more generally pretty, Angie has the charisma that makes her so much more attractive.