Jump to content

Bloodshot

Members

  • Joined

View Profile Find content

Posts posted by Bloodshot

    On 12/3/2017 at 9:21 AM, Rob S said:

     

    It is a reality and I'm sure Genevieve and her people took all that in to account, particularly for last year's calendar given the nudity. If you are going to create something of interest a small percentage of people are going to share it so they can get the virtual pat on the back and the 'thanks bro' comments on a fan forum. But it's perfectly natural for her to hope that fans will  have her artistic and financial interests at heart even before she has to put out her polite request not to share the images.  Maybe she should put a similar request in with any future calendar project.

     

    Last year my second favourite songstress requested (in advance of tickets going on sale)  that nobody use phones/cameras in her concerts during a small tour of church venues....and as if by magic, to this day not a single clip of any of those concerts appeared on video sites except for professionally shot ones she released herself (for free!) and I saw no phones being used in the concert I went to.

     

    You're denying reality here.  The pictures from both calendars are all over the Internet, it really has nothing to do with this site.  The music industry tried to fight digital distribution of its content and lost that battle badly.  The movie/tv industry has been more successful because they created streaming platforms, but still fight a large amount of piracy.  Anyone who thinks that content won't get online at some point, if not very quickly after it's been released, is just fooling themselves.

    So after looking at the Facebook video Genevieve posted about her frustration I will admit I'm not so sure the poster here is a fake anymore, although I'm not entirely convinced it is her either.  However, I'm a big enough man to admit if I'm wrong and the evidence may be pointing that way.

     

    Saying that, I think Genevieve is way off base here based on what she said on Facebook.  I definitely understand the frustrations artists have with their work being distributed on websites, which cuts into their compensation, but that's the double edged sword that exists because of the internet and fighting it isn't going to change reality.  Instead of being angry that she's not selling as many calendars as she expected, she should be looking at this as great marketing and exposure for her brand.  If she and her agent/manager use the trending metrics, that are publicly available, to paint the right picture it can help her get other modeling contracts that are guaranteed pay days.  All industries and businesses, and a model is a businesses unto herself, need to embrace the modern world we live in and accept the realities of doing business in this world.

     

     

    7 hours ago, BAGGOT said:

    Here's the thing: It sounds very much like @genevievemorton to me, and if @jj3 says it is Genevieve, I believe it is Genevieve. She has my deep respect, and as a longtime fan, I wish her nothing but success. 

     

    What do you guys want to bet it's not her?  There is zero chance that a model at her level is going to come on this site and start ranting like that.  Come on guys, think about.

    6 minutes ago, frenchkiki said:

    :rofl:

     

    + Miss Minaj got a super flat stomach and she is clearly not over weight. Even if men say they love women with curves they want the meat on the boobs & butt and that's it.

     

    Exactly!  We're picky creatures that want our curves in the "right" places.  Plus curvy ≠ overweight, that's just a certain segment of the population trying to usurp the term.

    2 hours ago, LameImpala said:

    Stop. Putting. Overweight. Girls. In. Sports. Illustrated.

     

    Thank you!  I really don't understand this at all.  Models are supposed to be an idealized version of beauty, not average, and especially not fat.  Also, fat acceptance is NOT ok in general, it's a public health issue.  As a society we decided that we wouldn't accept cigarette smoking and enacted policies to largely eliminate it from society.  Unfortunately, a generation later, we now have an obesity epidemic and instead of addressing it large portions of society are trying to normalize it.

    15 hours ago, hottness said:

    Well pizzarat is interested in Emily & her career. The comments can be positive or negative as pizza sees fit. That's what these threads are for imho

     

    I would agree with you if he ever actually posted anything positive, but his posts are almost exclusively negative, the rest of us aren't here for that.

    1 hour ago, Shepherd said:

     

    Yeah, ya know, I've gotten to where, for the most part, I just post pics and move on, because the hypercritical commentary from some members just pisses me off.

     

     

     

    Exactly, I'm not here to nitpick anyone's career.  Sadly the negativity seems to outweigh the posting of any pictures recently.

    32 minutes ago, pizzarat said:

    Thank you! I don't even post that much nor have I said anything negative in awhile before calling out that bore of interview. Spoiler alert: she says the same stuff in U.K. Glamour. Some ppl need to chill out and get off the internet bc it's not that serious, and it will all be ok. Trust me Emily isn't thinking about us.

     

     

    The point is that the negativity takes the enjoyment away from the rest of us, it has nothing to do with Emily, or a specific model.  Most people who come here aren't interested in overanalyzing a career and complaining about BS, we're here to be entertained.  The mods even just "cleaned up" this thread recently because of negativity, so don't pretend it's not happening.

     

    On 6/29/2017 at 9:42 AM, pizzarat said:

    Zzz...there's a piece of the interview up she literally tells all these magazines the same exact thing. Such a bore.

     

    @hottness I agree with you on pg 213

     

    I just don't get it, why do you keep coming to this forum if you don't like Emily?  Every single post is critical.  It gets really old when half this thread is people nitpicking and complaining about ridiculous things.

    5 hours ago, hottness said:

    Thanks for that. But I'm talking specifically about manipulating their bodies on IG to give the illusion that their bodies are something that they are not in reality.

     

    Models pose their bodies to look as best as they can, that's kind of the entire basis of the industry.  It really has nothing to do with Instagram specifically.  Considering how much nude work Emily has done, I don't think there's any question as to what her body looks like.

    1 hour ago, pizzarat said:

     Is it possible she's just manipulating her body for pictures? Her director posted a picture of her in athletic shorts and a crop top it's not the most flattering picture so I won't bother extracting it from his Instagram (ratliffgeorge) her head looks small but her body looks a lot thicker/solid and it's literally the same timeframe 

     

    18948113_305561836566824_252730302921283

     

    You're welcome.

    1 minute ago, Cult Icon said:

    is she in the Baywatch film or was her small role cut out of it?

     

    Haven't seen it, but pretty sure she had a tiny role, 1-2 lines max.  She went to all the premiers and was in marketing material, so I doubt they cut her.

    46 minutes ago, elfstone said:

    imagebam.com and imgbox.com will shut down on June 30. Can anyone backup the image links in this topic? :idk: 

     

    Well the site policy of not wanting link back to original sources for images is biting it in the butt.  Can't say the admins weren't warned by multiple people...