Avenger Posted September 16, 2005 Posted September 16, 2005 I used Firefox.Just clicked it and it offered to download or play. I chose download.With pa's file, right click- save as - works fine. Quote
Avenger Posted September 16, 2005 Posted September 16, 2005 From the two versions, I choose Heidegger's version.Much more complex and grandiose.Pa's version is not "stressful", just different. Quote
worshipper pa Posted September 16, 2005 Posted September 16, 2005 You boys have a long way to go before you understand good music! My version is the complex one. Quote
worshipper pa Posted September 16, 2005 Posted September 16, 2005 Teach us, Master!<{POST_SNAPBACK}>My pleasure!Keep listening Heidegger's and my versions with an open mind. Eventually you start to notice what's wrong with Heidegger's version and what's good in my version. Thicker sound does not mean greater complexity. There is much more nyances in my version. Quote
schadenfreude Posted September 17, 2005 Author Posted September 17, 2005 Keep listening Heidegger's and my versions with an open mind. Eventually you start to notice what's wrong with Heidegger's version and what's good in my version. Thicker sound does not mean greater complexity. There is much more nyances in my version.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>There is nothing wrong with both versions.One is like the authentic Star Wars, the other one is like the digitally-remastered version of Star Wars. Although the digitally-remastered versions are always better (DUUUUH!) , there will always be some stupid fanboys complaining about how it ruins their childhood memories. Quote
worshipper pa Posted September 17, 2005 Posted September 17, 2005 Keep listening Heidegger's and my versions with an open mind. Eventually you start to notice what's wrong with Heidegger's version and what's good in my version. Thicker sound does not mean greater complexity. There is much more nyances in my version.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>There is nothing wrong with both versions.One is like the authentic Star Wars, the other one is like the digitally-remastered version of Star Wars. Although the digitally-remastered versions are always better (DUUUUH!) , there will always be some stupid fanboys complaining about how it ruins their childhood memories.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>You use the term "digitally remastered" oddly. It's possible my version is a newer recording! Quote
schadenfreude Posted September 18, 2005 Author Posted September 18, 2005 If it is authentic, does it mean that it is the version that is played during Palcehlbel's time? Quote
worshipper pa Posted September 18, 2005 Posted September 18, 2005 If it is authentic, does it mean that it is the version that is played during Pachelbel's time?That's what being authentic means.It is very close to the versions that were played in his time. Of course it is difficult to know how those versions have sounded but given the instrumentation and knowledge of baroque music practises in those days it is possible to come up with a very accurate "academic guess". In other words nobody knows how that version could be more authentic. Quote
schadenfreude Posted September 24, 2005 Author Posted September 24, 2005 If it is authentic, does it mean that it is the version that is played during Pachelbel's time?That's what being authentic means.It is very close to the versions that were played in his time. Of course it is difficult to know how those versions have sounded but given the instrumentation and knowledge of baroque music practises in those days it is possible to come up with a very accurate "academic guess". In other words nobody knows how that version could be more authentic.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>If it is indeed close to the version played at that time, then it is certain that my recording is the later version. This is a pretty much open and shut case. There is no way you can refute this, unless of course, if you use the Chewbacca defense. Quote
worshipper pa Posted September 24, 2005 Posted September 24, 2005 If it is indeed close to the version played at that time, then it is certain that my recording is the later version. This is a pretty much open and shut case. There is no way you can refute this, unless of course, if you use the Chewbacca defense.What is it I would try to refute here? I am here the educate others. Take it or leave it. Chewbacca defense is not available for me. Quote
schadenfreude Posted September 24, 2005 Author Posted September 24, 2005 What is it I would try to refute here? I am here the educate others. Take it or leave it. Chewbacca defense is not available for me.Watch South Park: Episode 214! Quote
worshipper pa Posted September 24, 2005 Posted September 24, 2005 What is it I would try to refute here? I am here the educate others. Take it or leave it. Chewbacca defense is not available for me.Watch South Park: Episode 214!Not available for me. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.